The Facts

Proof That Auditing Election Machines Cannot Detect Manipulation Of Votes
  • Originally posted by Tore on November 19th, 2019.Serious fraud concerns were recently raised during the gubernatorial elections in the state of Kentucky. People who don’t have the right to vote were registered as Democrats, people voted in the name of other people, ballots were being shuffled and couriered around, as well as the revelation that the OWNER of Harp Enterprises that runs the elections in the state of Kentucky is ALSO the owner of a company that installs, maintains, and has access to the state of Kentucky county clerks networking systems. The one aspect of this election and the Louisiana election that just happened, that sadly has not been analyzed and or examined, is the strange number patterns we observe in voting across these states. Not just in the governor race, but in all the races that ran simultaneously. (More....)
Dominion’s Own FROG Destroys Their Claim
  • Here’s the truth. Dominion was created in John Poulos’s basement in Toronto to help blind people vote on paper ballots. Its systems are certified under standards promulgated by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”). This involves a rigorous review and testing process conducted by independent laboratories accredited by the EAC, and Dominion designed the voting systems to be auditable and include a paper ballot backup to verify results. Because of these safeguards, there is overwhelming direct evidence that conclusively disproves claims about Dominion manipulating vote counts—namely, the millions of paper ballots that were audited and recounted by bipartisan election officials, confirming that Dominion accurately counted votes on paper ballots.
Once a Liberal Darling, Bev Harris Still Thinks the Elections Are Rigged

“Frankly, although the media kind of sat on [Trump] pretty hard for saying he wouldn’t necessarily accept the results, it is ridiculous to say that a candidate or the public has to accept votes it can never verify,” she says. “We absolutely have the right to verify the count and to verify the results we are told are true.”

Two convicted felons involved with vote by mail

The primary architect for current vote-by-mail computer software was Jeffrey Dean, an embezzler who specialized in computer crime...
...While in prison, embezzler Jeffrey Dean became friends with a narcotics trafficker named John Elder. While still in prison, on a work-release program, Jeffrey Dean was tasked with creating a computerized vote by mail program for King County, Washington. He began this assignment while working for his brother, Neil Dean, whose business had a contract with King County to provide temporary workers for its huge absentee voting operation...

Find this and a whole lot more on 'TheBrain', a compendium of Election related topics

The Elections: A Brain Heirarchical Tree showing all the connections. Here you can see all the systems, software, people, groups, laws and legislation that effects our current voting system. By using this tool, you can easily put your finger on many items that create an insecure, fallable, untraceable vote using todays methods of Electronic and Mail in Voting.


EVIDENCE | “There Is No Place Like Home (land Security Running Elections)” that’s Unconstitutional

After audits, symposiums, data parsing, and so much more, it looks like the ONLY affidavit that outlined all the findings in the past two years that the press had a field day with is the ONLY one that had all the information needed to rectify the situation on legal grounds and has been factually accurate until this day. Who is running the elections, and why are machines not certified according to the Congressionally passed legislation HAVA ACT of 2002?